Introduction to bootUR

The R package bootUR implements several bootstrap tests for unit roots, both for single time series and for (potentially) large systems of time series.

Installation and Loading

Installation

The package can be installed from CRAN using

install.packages("bootUR")

The development version of the bootUR package can be installed from GitHub using

# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("smeekes/bootUR")

When installing from GitHub, in order to build the package from source, you need to have the appropriate R development tools installed (Rtools on Windows, or these tools on Mac).

If you want the vignette to appear in your package when installing from GitHub, use

# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("smeekes/bootUR", build_vignettes = TRUE, dependencies = TRUE)

instead. As building the vignette may take a bit of time (all bootstrap code below is run), package installation will be slower this way.

Load Package

After installation, the package can be loaded in the standard way:

library(bootUR)

Preliminary Analysis: Missing Values

bootUR provides a few simple tools to check if your data are suitable to be bootstrapped.

Inspect Data for Missing Values

The bootstrap tests in bootUR do not work with missing data, although multivariate time series with different start and end dates (unbalanced panels) are allowed. bootUR provides a simple function to check if your data contain missing values. We will illustrate this on the MacroTS dataset of macroeconomic time series that comes with the package.

data("MacroTS")
check_missing_insample_values(MacroTS)
#>  GDP_BE  GDP_DE  GDP_FR  GDP_NL  GDP_UK CONS_BE CONS_DE CONS_FR CONS_NL CONS_UK 
#>   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE 
#> HICP_BE HICP_DE HICP_FR HICP_NL HICP_UK   UR_BE   UR_DE   UR_FR   UR_NL   UR_UK 
#>   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE   FALSE

Checking Start and End Points of Time Series

If your time series have different starting and end points (and thus some series contain NAs at the beginning and/or end of your sample, the resampling-based moving block bootstrap (MBB) and sieve bootstrap (SB) cannot be used. bootUR lets you check the start and end points as follows:

sample_check <- find_nonmissing_subsample(MacroTS)
# Provides the number of the first and last non-missing observation for each series:
sample_check$range 
#>       GDP_BE GDP_DE GDP_FR GDP_NL GDP_UK CONS_BE CONS_DE CONS_FR CONS_NL
#> first      1      1      1      5      1       1       1       1       5
#> last     100    100    100    100    100     100     100     100     100
#>       CONS_UK HICP_BE HICP_DE HICP_FR HICP_NL HICP_UK UR_BE UR_DE UR_FR UR_NL
#> first       1       9       9       9       9       9     1     1     1     1
#> last      100     100     100     100     100     100   100   100   100   100
#>       UR_UK
#> first     1
#> last    100

# Gives TRUE if the time series all start and end at the same observation:
sample_check$all_equal
#> [1] FALSE

Visualizing Missing Data

If you have ggplot2 installed, you can also plot the missing data patterns in your series to get a quick overview. You may need to manipulate some arguments to get the plot properly sized (therefore it is not run here automatically).

plot_missing_values(MacroTS, show_names = TRUE, axis_text_size = 5, legend_size = 6)

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test

As the standard test for unit roots, bootUR also has an implementation of the standard, non-bootstrap, augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test (though its use is not recommended if sample sizes are small). For this purpose the adf() function can be used. The function allows to set many options. First, one can choose between the classical single-step procedure (two_step = FALSE), in which deterministic components are directly included in the test regression, and the more flexible and modern two-step procedure (two_step = TRUE) where deterministic components are first removed before applying the unit root test to detrended data. For the standard ADF test, the two specifications generally yield nearly identical results.

Lag selection

Lag length selection is done automatically in the ADF regression; the default is by the modified Akaike information criterion (MAIC) proposed by Ng and Perron (2001) with the correction of Perron and Qu (2008). Other options include the regular Akaike information criterion (AIC), as well as the Bayesian information criterion and its modified variant. In addition, the rescaling suggested by Cavaliere et al. (2015) is implemented to improve the power of the test under heteroskedasticity; this can be turned off by setting criterion_scale = FALSE. To overwrite data-driven lag length selection with a pre-specified lag length, simply set both the minimum min_lag and maximum lag length max_lag for the selection algorithm equal to the desired lag length.

Implementation

We illustrate the ADF test here on Dutch GDP for the two-step specification, including a linear trend in the specification.

GDP_NL <- MacroTS[, 4]
adf(GDP_NL, deterministics = "trend")
#> 
#>  Two-step ADF test (with trend) on a single time series
#> 
#> data: GDP_NL
#> null hypothesis: Series has a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Series is stationary
#> 
#>        estimate largest root statistic p-value
#> GDP_NL                0.9471    -2.515  0.3202

Univariate Bootstrap Unit Root Tests

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test

To perform a bootstrap version of the ADF unit root test on a single time series, use the boot_adf() function. The function allows to set many options, including the bootstrap method used (option bootstrap), the deterministic components included (option deterministics) and the type of detrending used (option detrend). While detrend = "OLS" gives the standard ADF test, detrend = "QD" provides the powerful DF-GLS test of Elliott, Rothenberg and Stock (1996). Here we use the terminology Quasi-Differencing (QD) rather than GLS as this conveys the meaning less ambiguously and is the same terminology used by Smeekes and Taylor (2012) and Smeekes (2013). In all cases, two-step detrending is used.

Implementation

We illustrate the bootstrap ADF test here on Dutch GDP, with the sieve bootstrap (bootstrap = SB) as in the specification used by Palm, Smeekes and Urbain (2008) and Smeekes (2013). To get the well-known test proposed by Paparoditis and Politis (2003), set bootstrap = "MBB". We set only 399 bootstrap replications (B = 399) to prevent the code from running too long. We add an intercept and a trend (deterministics = "trend") and OLS detrending. The console gives you live updates on the bootstrap progress. To turn these off, set show_progress = FALSE. The bootstrap loop can be run in parallel by setting do_parallel = TRUE (the default).

As random number generation is required to draw bootstrap samples, we first set the seed of the random number generator to obtain replicable results.

set.seed(155776)
boot_adf(GDP_NL, B = 399, bootstrap = "SB", deterministics = "trend", 
                    detrend = "OLS", do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************
#> 
#>  SB bootstrap OLS test (with intercept and trend) on a single time
#>  series
#> 
#> data: GDP_NL
#> null hypothesis: Series has a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Series is stationary
#> 
#>        estimate largest root statistic p-value
#> GDP_NL                0.9471    -2.515  0.1454

Union of Rejections Test

Use boot_union() for a test based on the union of rejections of 4 tests with different number of deterministic components and different type of detrending (Smeekes and Taylor, 2012). The advantage of the union test is that you don’t have to specify these (rather influential) specification tests. This makes the union test a safe option for quick or automatic unit root testing where careful manual specification setup is not viable. Here we illustrate it with the sieve wild bootstrap as proposed by Smeekes and Taylor (2012).

boot_union(GDP_NL, B = 399, bootstrap = "SWB", do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************
#> 
#>  SWB bootstrap union test on a single time series
#> 
#> data: GDP_NL
#> null hypothesis: Series has a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Series is stationary
#> 
#>        estimate largest root statistic p-value
#> GDP_NL                    NA   -0.7115   0.614

Panel Unit Root Test

The function boot_panel performs a test on a multivariate (panel) time series by testing the null hypothesis that all series have a unit root. A rejection is typically interpreted as evidence that a ‘significant proportion’ of the series is stationary, although how large that proportion is - or which series are stationary - is not given by the test. The test is based on averaging the individual test statistics, also called the Group-Mean (GM) test in Palm, Smeekes and Urbain (2011).

Palm, Smeekes and Urbain (2011) introduced this test with the moving block bootstrap (bootstrap = "MBB"). However, this resampling-based method cannot handle unbalancedness, and will therefore give an error when applied to MacroTS:

boot_panel(MacroTS, bootstrap = "MBB", B = 399, do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Error in check_inputs(data = data, boot_sqt_test = boot_sqt_test, boot_ur_test = boot_ur_test, : Resampling-based bootstraps MBB and SB cannot handle unbalanced series.

Therefore, you should switch to one of the wild bootstrap methods. Here we illustrate it with the dependent wild bootstrap (DWB) of Shao (2010) and Rho and Shao (2019).

By default the union test is used for each series (union = TRUE), if this is set to FALSE the deterministic components and detrending methods can be specified as in the univariate Dickey-Fuller test.

Although the sieve bootstrap method "SB" and "SWB" can be used (historically they have been popular among practitioners), Smeekes and Urbain (2014b) show that these are not suited to capture general forms of dependence across units. The code will give a warning to recommend using a different bootstrap method.

boot_panel(MacroTS, bootstrap = "DWB", B = 399, do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************
#> 
#>  Panel DWB bootstrap group-mean union test
#> 
#> data: MacroTS
#> null hypothesis: All series have a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Some series are stationary
#> 
#>         estimate largest root statistic p-value
#> MacroTS                    NA   -0.8621  0.1103

Tests for Multiple Time Series

Individual ADF Tests

To perform individual ADF tests on multiple time series simultaneously, the function boot_ur() can still be used. As the bootstrap is performed for all series simultaneously, resampling-based bootstrap methods "MBB" and "SB" cannot be used directly in case of unbalanced panels. If they are used anyway, the function will revert to splitting the bootstrap up and performing it individually per time series. In this case a warning is given to alert the user.

ADFtests_out <- boot_ur(MacroTS[, 1:5], bootstrap = "MBB", B = 399, union = FALSE, 
                        deterministics = "trend", detrend = "OLS", do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Warning in check_inputs(data = data, boot_sqt_test = boot_sqt_test,
#> boot_ur_test = boot_ur_test, : Missing values cause resampling bootstrap to be
#> executed for each time series individually.
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************

print(ADFtests_out)
#> 
#>  MBB bootstrap ADF test (with intercept and trend) on each individual
#>  series (no multiple testing correction)
#> 
#> data: MacroTS[, 1:5]
#> null hypothesis: Series has a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Series is stationary
#> 
#> Tests performed on each series: 
#>        estimate largest root statistic p-value
#> GDP_BE                0.9304    -2.792  0.1955
#> GDP_DE                0.8911    -2.774  0.1003
#> GDP_FR                0.9655    -2.049  0.5113
#> GDP_NL                0.9471    -2.515  0.1930
#> GDP_UK                0.9600    -2.449  0.2882

Note that boot_ur (intentionally) does not provide a correction for multiple testing; of course, if we perform each test with a significance level of 5%, the probability of making a mistake in all these tests becomes (much, if N is large) more than 5%. To explicitly account for multiple testing, use the functions boot_sqt() or boot_fdr().

Bootstrap Sequential Tests

The function boot_sqt() performs the Bootstrap Sequential Quantile Test (BSQT) proposed by Smeekes (2015). Here we split the series in groups which are consecutively tested for unit roots, starting with the group most likely to be stationary (having the smallest ADF statistics). If the unit root hypothesis cannot be rejected for the first group, the algorithm stops; if there is a rejection, the second group is tested, and so on.

Most options are the same as for boot_panel. The parameter SQT_level controls the significance level of the individual tests performed in the sequence, with a default value of 0.05. The other important new parameter to set here is the group sizes. These can either be set in units, or in fractions of the total number of series (i.e. quantiles, hence the name) via the parameter steps. If we have N time series, setting steps = 0:N means each unit should be tested sequentially. To split the series in four equally sized groups (regardless of many series there are), use steps = 0:4 / 4. By convention and in accordance with notation in Smeekes (2015), the first entry of the vector should be equal to zero, while the second entry indicates the end of the first group, and so on. However, if the initial zero is accidentally omitted, it is automatically added by the function. Similarly, if the final value is not equal to 1 (in case of quantiles) or N to end the last group, this is added by the function.

Testing individual series consecutively is easiest for interpretation, but is only meaningful if N is small. In this case the method is equivalent to the bootstrap StepM method of Romano and Wolf (2005), which controls the familywise error rate, that is the probability of making at least one false rejection. This can get very conservative if N is large, and you would typically end up not rejecting any null hypothesis. The method is illustrated with the autoregressive wild bootstrap of Smeekes and Urbain (2014a) and Friedrich, Smeekes and Urbain (2020).

N <- ncol(MacroTS)
# Test each unit sequentially
boot_sqt(MacroTS, steps = 0:N, bootstrap = "AWB", B = 399, do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************
#> 
#>  AWB bootstrap sequential quantile union test
#> 
#> data: MacroTS
#> null hypothesis: Series has a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Series is stationary
#> 
#> Sequence of tests: 
#>        H0: # I(0) H1: # I(0)  tstat p-value
#> Step 1          0          1 -1.661 0.02256
#> Step 2          1          2 -1.413 0.12281

# Split in four equally sized groups (motivated by the 4 series per country)
boot_sqt(MacroTS, steps = 0:4 / 4, bootstrap = "AWB", B = 399, do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************
#> 
#>  AWB bootstrap sequential quantile union test
#> 
#> data: MacroTS
#> null hypothesis: Series has a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Series is stationary
#> 
#> Sequence of tests: 
#>        H0: # I(0) H1: # I(0)  tstat p-value
#> Step 1          0          5 -1.052 0.05013

Bootstrap FDR Controlling Tests

The function boot_fdr() controls for multiple testing by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), which is defined as the expected proportion of false rejections relative to the total number of rejections. This scales with the total number of tests, making it more suitable for large N than the familywise error rate.

The bootstrap method for controlling FDR was introduced by Romano, Shaikh and Wolf (2008), who showed that, unlike the classical way to control FDR, the bootstrap is appropriate under general forms of dependence between series. Moon and Perron (2012) applied this method to unit root testing; it is essentially their method which is implemented in boot_fdr() though again with the option to change the bootstrap used (their suggestion was MBB). The arguments to be set are the same as for the other multivariate unit root tests, with the exception of FDR_level wihch controls the FDR level. As BSQT, the method only report those tests until no rejection occurs.

We illustrate it here with the final available bootstrap method, the block wild bootstrap of Shao (2011) and Smeekes and Urbain (2014a).

boot_fdr(MacroTS[, 1:10], FDR_level = 0.1, bootstrap = "BWB", B = 399, do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************
#> 
#>  BWB bootstrap union test with false discovery rate control
#> 
#> data: MacroTS[, 1:10]
#> null hypothesis: Series has a unit root
#> alternative hypothesis: Series is stationary
#> 
#> Sequence of tests: 
#>         tstat critical value
#> GDP_DE -1.077         -1.581

Determining Order of Integration

Generally the unit root tests above would only be used as a single step in a larger algorithm to determine the orders of integration of the time series in the dataset. In particular, many economic datasets contain variables that have order of integration 2, and would so need to be differenced twice to eliminate all trends. A standard unit root test cannot determine this however. For this purpose, we add the function order_integration() which performs a sequence of unit root tests to determine the orders of each time series.

How does it work

Starting from a maximum order (by default equal to 2), it differences the data time until there can be at most one unit root. If the test is not rejected for a particular series, we know this series if of order . The series for which we do reject are integrated once (such that they are differenced times from their original level), and the test is repeated. By doing so until we have classified all series, we obtain a full specification of the orders of all time series.

Implementation

The function allows us to choose which unit root test we want to use. Here we take boot_fdr. We don’t only get the orders out, but also the appropriately differenced data.

out_orders <- order_integration(MacroTS[, 11:15], method = "boot_fdr", B = 399, 
                                do_parallel = FALSE)
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************
#> Progress: |------------------| 
#>           ********************

# Orders
out_orders$order_int
#> HICP_BE HICP_DE HICP_FR HICP_NL HICP_UK 
#>       0       0       1       0       1

# Differenced data
stationary_data <- out_orders$diff_data

To achieve the differencing, order_integration() uses the function diff_mult() which is also available as stand-alone function in the package. Finally, a function is provided to plot the found orders (not run):

plot_order_integration(out_orders)

References

Cavaliere, G., Phillips, P.C.B., Smeekes, S., and Taylor, A.M.R. (2015). Lag length selection for unit root tests in the presence of nonstationary volatility. Econometric Reviews, 34(4), 512-536.
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J., and Stock, J.H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813-836.
Friedrich, M., Smeekes, S. and Urbain, J.-P. (2020). Autoregressive wild bootstrap inference for nonparametric trends. Journal of Econometrics, 214(1), 81-109.
Moon, H.R. and Perron, B. (2012). Beyond panel unit root tests: Using multiple testing to determine the non stationarity properties of individual series in a panel. Journal of Econometrics, 169(1), 29-33.
Ng, S. and Perron, P. (2001). Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power. Econometrica, 69(6), 1519-1554,
Palm, F.C., Smeekes, S. and Urbain, J.-P. (2008). Bootstrap unit root tests: Comparison and extensions. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 29(1), 371-401.
Palm, F. C., Smeekes, S., and Urbain, J.-.P. (2011). Cross-sectional dependence robust block bootstrap panel unit root tests. Journal of Econometrics, 163(1), 85-104.
Paparoditis, E. and Politis, D.N. (2003). Residual‐based block bootstrap for unit root testing. Econometrica, 71(3), 813-855.
Perron, P. and Qu, Z. (2008). A simple modification to improve the finite sample properties of Ng and Perron’s unit root tests. Economic Letters, 94(1), 12-19.
Rho, Y. and Shao, X. (2019). Bootstrap-assisted unit root testing with piecewise locally stationary errors. Econometric Theory, 35(1), 142-166.
Romano, J.P., Shaikh, A.M., and Wolf, M. (2008). Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling. Test, 17(3), 417.
Romano, J. P. and Wolf, M. (2005). Stepwise multiple testing as formalized data snooping. Econometrica, 73(4), 1237-1282.
Shao, X. (2010). The dependent wild bootstrap. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(489), 218-235.
Shao, X. (2011). A bootstrap-assisted spectral test of white noise under unknown dependence. Journal of Econometrics, 162, 213-224.
Smeekes (2013). Detrending bootstrap unit root tests. Econometric Reviews, 32(8), 869-891.
Smeekes, S. (2015). Bootstrap sequential tests to determine the order of integration of individual units in a time series panel. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 36(3), 398-415.
Smeekes, S. and Taylor, A.M.R. (2012). Bootstrap union tests for unit roots in the presence of nonstationary volatility. Econometric Theory, 28(2), 422-456.
Smeekes, S. and Urbain, J.-P. (2014a). A multivariate invariance principle for modified wild bootstrap methods with an application to unit root testing. GSBE Research Memorandum No. RM/14/008, Maastricht University.
Smeekes, S. and Urbain, J.-P. (2014b). On the applicability of the sieve bootstrap in time series panels. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 139-151.

Stephan Smeekes and Ines Wilms

20 May, 2024

Installation and Loading

Installation

Load Package

Preliminary Analysis: Missing Values

Inspect Data for Missing Values

Checking Start and End Points of Time Series

Visualizing Missing Data

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test

Univariate Bootstrap Unit Root Tests

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test

Union of Rejections Test

Panel Unit Root Test

Tests for Multiple Time Series

Individual ADF Tests

Bootstrap Sequential Tests

Bootstrap FDR Controlling Tests

Determining Order of Integration

How does it work

Implementation

References